The Economist Magazine's March 13th 2021 issue has a great story about drone use and drone expenditure.

The piece starts by talking about Tom Cruise in the movie "Top Gun" and says that manned airplanes are expensive.  One justification for substituting such flights and instead using drones is to save costs.

Per hour of flying drones are cheaper than manned aircrafts (even if Tom Cruise isn't the pilot!),   But, the Rebound Effect lurks

Since Drones are cheaper per hour of flying, the Military chooses to fly more hours.  The military's Demand curve slopes down and apparently is price sensitive.  So, the total expenditure on flights has increased as drones have replaced Tom Cruise!

This is the Rebound Effect in action.

I really like Paul Krugman's NY Times piece from today.   It focuses on his predictions about the short term future of cities.   Here is a quote from the Nobel Laureate. 

"So the best bet is that life and work in, say, 2023 will look a lot like life and work in 2019, but a bit less so. We may commute to the office less than we used to; there may well be a glut of urban office space." 

In the early 2000s,  Ed Glaeser and I wrote two papers about the rise of suburban employment.

I have moved my climate change economics blogging over to Substack.  

In February 2021, we published our urban economics book ;

You can read chapter One and watch several relevant urban economic growth videos posted here.

Next week, Yale University Press will publish my new book 

This book has already won a prize and you can learn more here.  

I am eager to market both books.  Email me at mek1966@gmail.com to arrange book talks.
My Research and My Books
My Research and My Books
To learn more about my research click here.

To purchase one of my four books, click here.
Popular Posts
Popular Posts
Blog Archive
Blog Archive
Loading
Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger. Report Abuse.