Saturday, January 29, 2011

The Law of Demand: The Case of Egypt's Nascent Revolution

"Everyone seemed nervous. Nasser al-Sherif, 24, looked for his friends, who were late. It was his first protest in Egypt. “I’m just here to say no,” he said. “Once things get rough and violent, I might leave.”" source   I would call this guy an eloquent free rider.  When the going gets tough, he gets going!  Let somebody else do the fighting for him.

Multiple equilibria exist in this case.  If the Egyptian rioters "enjoy" their experience and grow more confident and gain in numbers, then there could be a peaceful regime change as the Mubarak government chooses to quit without a fight.  Dora Costa and I studied a similar issue in this U.S Civil War desertion paper.  We used a large sample of Union Army soldiers and their choice of deserting or not to document that both "Macro Factors" (i.e was the Union Winning recent battles) and "co-ordination factors" (i.e were men  in your unit deserting) both influenced the probability that any individual deserted in a given month.  So, the math is tricky here;  your probability of deserting is a function of whether all the men around you are deserting.  This is like a bank run.  Returning to Egypt, it is cheaper to protest if you know that everyone else will protest with you. There is strength in numbers.

But, the Mubarak government may have learned the wrong lessons from China's 1989 hard line at Tiananmen
Square.  If Mubarak plays "fight", then people will die and rational free riders such as Nasser al-Sherif will quit the fight and "the people" are likely to lose.   The good news for Nasser is that in this age of Twitter and the Internet, the world will know that this unfair fight is playing out and Egypt would risk suffering greatly on the world stage.

The Military represents a 3rd player in this complicated game. Who do they work for?  Who is the leader of the military in the middle of a riot?  
If there is a revolution in Egypt, what nation is next in the domino chain?  The United States?

3 comments :

Brian said...

It's also possible that Nasser opposes violence in this context.

phoneranger said...

When I saw freerider I automatically thought of the Muslim Brotherhood. They stand to gain enormously as the MB is apparently the only organized resistance organization with the scale to run the country. Not unlike Lenin in 1917 or the Republicans in 2010.

Nash said...

This is Nasser Alsherif. I would like to say that Brain is correct. I totally reject violence. I am proud that for 15 days i spent in Tahrir Square, i never throw a rock or participated in any violent act. Our peaceful resistance was based on facing rubber bullets, sticks and tear gas with our bodies only. What i meant in that statement is that i won't participate in any violent actions taken by the Protesters.