. In the case of the siting of the Los Angeles Red Line, Altshuler and Luberoff (2003) stress that the transportation agency followed the path of least resistance:
“As originally conceived, this segment was to run for about five miles under Wilshire Boulevard, the most densely developed corridor west of the Mississippi River, before turning north toward the San Fernando Valley. In the mid-1980s, however, homeowners in a mid-Wilshire neighborhood objected that the line would stimulate too much development in their vicinity and might expose them to more crime by facilitating travel from low income areas … When Congress did eventually approve funding for the line, it did so with a proviso (inserted by Representative Henry Waxman who represented mid-Wilshire) that it could not pass through the mid-Wilshire area. Instead it would now turn north before it reached the neighborhoods in which substantial opposition had emerged and it would serve Universal City area. Because the new alignment was through less dense areas, it had considerably lower patronage potential than the original routing, but it faced no significant opposition – and that was what counted politically. In a similar vein, localities frequently minimized controversy by siting new transit lines in existing rail or freeway corridors, chosen for their availability rather than their optimality from a patronage standpoint. This strategy was used, for example, in Portland and Sacramento and for portions of the Los Angeles’ new Blue Line (Altshuler and Luberoff 2003, p204).”
This article below highlights that UCLA people will have easier access to the beach and the Rand Institute. What year will this project be done? Perhaps in 2030? My grandkids will enjoy it and then maybe they can connect to BART and ride North to Berkeley?
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/los_angeles_metro/la-me-subway8feb08,1,4420053.story?track=rss
House votes to repeal law blocking subway construction on L.A.'s Westside
Rep. Henry Waxman persuades lawmakers that a ban on federal funding for tunneling, which he pushed in 1985, should now be lifted. The move eliminates an obstacle to extending the line.
By Richard Simon
Times Staff Writer
February 8, 2007
WASHINGTON — Two decades ago, Rep. Henry A. Waxman wrote into law a ban on the use of federal funds to build a subway tunnel in the Fairfax district of Los Angeles, worried that construction could trigger an underground gas explosion.
On Wednesday, the Los Angeles Democrat — now convinced that new technology could make drilling safe — persuaded the House to repeal his 1985 law, removing a major political obstacle to extending the line to the Westside.
The one-page bill passed on a voice vote.
The Senate is likely to follow suit soon, and President Bush is expected to sign the repeal into law.
Roger Snoble, chief executive officer of Los Angeles County's Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said the measure "opens the possibility of securing federal money to extend our subway westward to help alleviate the area's crushing traffic congestion."
A subway extension from its western terminus at Wilshire Boulevard and Western Avenue to the ocean about 13 miles away would cost at least $4.8 billion and require years of planning, design and construction. Securing federal funds at a time of massive budget deficits and fierce competition for dollars will also be no easy task.
"There is still much work to do before the subway can be extended," Rep. Diane Watson (D-Los Angeles) said in a statement after the vote.
Waxman sought the tunneling ban after more than 20 people were injured in a methane gas explosion at a West 3rd Street clothing store.
But with traffic congestion growing worse, local officials led by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa asked him to reconsider the ban.
"Very few issues affect the quality of life in Los Angeles more than traffic gridlock," Villaraigosa said in a statement. "Getting stuck in traffic is more than just an inconvenience — it keeps us away from our families, it pollutes our environment and it costs our economy. Building a subway to the sea will get Los Angeles moving again."
Villaraigosa noted that Los Angeles ranks first in the country in the amount of time that drivers spend in traffic jams — about 93 hours a year.
Waxman said he agreed to repeal his earlier bill after an independent panel of experts "indicated that technologies have been developed that could make tunneling in the area safe."
A similar repeal measure was approved by the House last year, but died in the Senate in the waning days of Congress.
California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, both Democrats, this week introduced legislation to repeal the 1985 tunneling ban.
"It's time to make this project a reality," Feinstein said of the extension.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
richard.simon@latimes.com