Monday, September 19, 2005

What's the value-added of think tanks? Should Harvard Move to Washington D.C?

What would be the consequences for idea consumers if there were no think tanks? I see a couple of implications regarding; 1. career paths and risk taking by intellectuals, 2. Intellectual middlemen and the media, 3. co-ordination. Let me explain.

1. An old cliché is that thinkers enter think tanks when their Political Party is not in power. If think tanks did not exist, would “policy wonks” go to Washington? Only risk lovers would go and try to spend their career there. The risk averse wimps would seek out the relatively scarce jobs in full time academia. Think tanks offer a type of insurance policy for leaders to hang out while out of power. You might argue that an unintended consequence of this is that Government does not attract enough “new blood”. I agree with this point but if there is learning by doing on the job then recycling is not such a bad thing.

2. Transaction Costs: Most newspaper articles quote some expert usually like a spice. Interesting recent studies have examined media bias by measuring which experts from which institutions (left wing/right wing) are regularly cited in which newspapers. If there were no think tanks, journalists would face higher transaction costs in finding an expert to quote. Do journalists have downward sloping demand curves?

3. Conferences and co-ordination problems --- Think tanks conferences help to co-ordinate where and when economists meet up. I must admit that I really enjoy the annual Brookings/Wharton Urban Affairs conference at Brookings. The papers are interesting and it attracts most of the leading urban scholars in one room for 2 days.

4. Blogs and the Internet tend to reduce the need for think tanks. I believe that blogs substitute for think tanks. Each economics blogger basically now has his own think tank except there is no lunch room or seminar. Reporters can easily google blogs to find a quotable economist. Since I started my blog, I’ve been approached by more reporters than in the past.

5. I do think that many think tanks generate "new" ideas that are real world
focused that may not have been generated had these nerds been sitting in a pure
academic setting. I realize this is a tough "what if" but hey this is only a blog!

6. Think Tank Book Publication Presses --- most academic presses are too academic focusing on small niche fields where the vocabulary is so jargon filled that only
"insiders" can read it. Such monopoly power is rarely a good thing. The Think
tanks (Brookings, Resources for the Future, AEI, Cato) produce readable books filled with big ideas.

7. Here is an open question for you. If Harvard was in Washington D.C, would there be less of a need for Washington think tanks? Would national public policy improve as its faculty and students “moonlighted”? Proximity matters and many leading minds who care about government and believe in government’s ability to improve well being are in Cambridge not Washington.

1 comment :

Anonymous said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,

徵信社,外遇, 離婚, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信,外遇, 抓姦, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社,徵信,徵信,